I remember how my final college year was spent researching on the impact of tourism to the rice wine production of Sagada. Almost five years passed and I believe I can see the validation of my findings. I cannot be happier with the grade I got in exchange for the fervor that I have spent on the research. I am happiest however with the fact that I was on the right track on thinking that at some point in time, the rice wine production will be split into the type that is palatable to tourism and the type that will adhere to the traditional taste. Afraid though that the findings might imply the possibility of a traditional practice of wine making being forgotten in exchange for commercial acceptance.
I fear that a commercially driven production might harm the traditional identity of the rice wine. I fear that the children of tomorrow might not know the authentic taste and value of tapey and will just be relying on what is commercially available as a reference. I hope that these fears will not be validated soon.
Maybe the reason why I wanted to write this blog was to give a warning of the possibilities that we will likely face should we trade tradition with profit and convenience. Some might ask why I am so strong on safeguarding tradition and identity, for what are we without them? Today it might be case of the wine and tomorrow it might be our whole identity.
I went home recently and saw some tell-tale of these happening. For example, I was dismayed at the quality of the nilapet being sold these days. I was expecting a larger piece with some sweet nut fillings- I got a lousy excuse of a kakanin. That may be harsh but what does that reflect of the community distinguished at priding this delicacy? The only solution I can think of is the active participation of today's generation in the documentation and preservation of these practices.